The launch of OpenAI's Operator in January 2025 marks a significant shift in how artificial intelligence interacts with the digital world. This new tool, which can browse the web and complete tasks autonomously, represents more than just another AI product release - it signals the emergence of a new category of technology companies focused on building "agentic" AI.
Agentic AI, as defined by AI researcher Andrew Ng, refers to systems that can take independent action rather than simply responding to commands. These AI agents can handle complex tasks like analysing data, making decisions, and executing actions without constant human oversight. The implications for business are substantial - OpenAI's Sam Altman predicts these agents will "materially change the output of companies" this year.
The venture capital community has taken notice. Since the start of 2024, European investors alone have poured billions into AI agent startups. From France's Mistral raising €600m to Germany's Helsing securing €450m, the race to build and deploy these autonomous systems is accelerating.
Written by: Andrew Mazalkov
The Rise of Agentic AI: A New Market Takes Shape
Source: AI Europe Report 2024
The venture capital world is experiencing a significant shift in focus towards agentic AI, with investors increasingly viewing these autonomous systems as the next major frontier in technology. European VCs alone have poured €481m into AI agent startups in just the first six weeks of 2025 - representing over a quarter of all AI agent funding for 2024.
This surge in investment reflects a fundamental change in how AI systems operate. Traditional AI tools respond to specific commands, but agentic AI takes a more autonomous approach, independently handling complex tasks from analyzing data to executing decisions. As data from Dealroom shows, this has driven AI to become the third fastest-growing sector in European venture capital since 2016, surpassed only by Energy and Robotics.
However, experienced investors are approaching this boom with measured caution. "There is a significant risk of a boom-bust cycle with AI agent startups," notes Denny Gabriel from Runa Capital: "This era is no different than the cloud, mobile and internet eras." The concern stems from companies raising money at potentially inflated valuations while their products remain unproven.
A Two-Sided Market Emerges
The agentic AI landscape is dividing into two distinct categories:
Infrastructure Providers: Companies building the foundational technology and tools that enable AI agents to operate. These include firms like Mistral AI in France, which raised €468m to develop its foundational models.
Vertical Solutions: Startups applying agentic AI to specific industries or use cases. For example, the UK's Nomba (formerly Kudi) uses AI agents to revolutionize financial services in emerging markets.
This bifurcation reflects a maturing market where both platform providers and specialized applications can thrive. According to Sifted's research, European investors have identified over 18 promising AI agent startups across these categories, suggesting the sector's growth has genuine substance beyond mere hype.
The key differentiator in this emerging market appears to be the approach to autonomy itself. Infrastructure providers like Mistral AI are focusing on building large, capable models that can serve as the foundation for numerous applications. Meanwhile, vertical solution providers are taking these base capabilities and applying them to specific, real-world problems.
This division is reflected in the funding data from Dealroom. According to their analysis, model makers and applications with proprietary models have attracted the bulk of venture capital investment in Europe, securing over 70% of total AI funding in 2023-2024. However, as Scott Friend of Bain Capital notes, "The influencer business model is disrupting the marketing space, with a significant focus on leveraging social influence to generate revenue.". This points to a potential third category emerging: platforms that enable the creation and deployment of AI agents by non-technical users.
This democratisation of AI agent creation could be particularly significant for the European market, where a strong tradition of small and medium-sized enterprises creates demand for accessible, practical AI solutions. As Sifted reports, this has led to the emergence of companies focused on making agent creation and deployment as simple as setting up a website.
Geographic Distribution of AI Agent Innovation
Looking at the funding data above, a clear pattern emerges in how AI agent development is distributed across Europe. The UK leads with £2.1B in AI-focused venture funding, followed closely by France and Germany. This concentration in what might be called Europe's "AI triangle" isn't accidental - it reflects deep institutional expertise and robust support systems in these regions.
France, in particular, has emerged as a powerhouse in AI agent development. The country's success in attracting AI investment - accounting for 30% of all European VC funding in 2024 - stems from a combination of strong technical talent and governmental support. The rise of Mistral AI, with its €600m raise, exemplifies this momentum.
The UK maintains its traditional strength in fintech-focused AI applications, while German companies like Helsing are pushing boundaries in areas like defence and security. This specialisation shows how different regional ecosystems are finding their niches within the broader AI agent landscape.
However, this concentration of resources raises questions about the broader European tech ecosystem. While major hubs flourish, data shows that AI funding remains highly concentrated - the UK, France, and Germany attracted 77% of all AI funding in Europe in 2023-2024, compared to 59% for other tech sectors.
This concentration of AI talent and capital creates both opportunities and challenges for the European tech sector. While it has enabled the emergence of world-class AI companies, it also risks leaving other regions behind. The Nordic countries, traditionally strong in technology innovation, have seen relatively modest AI investment compared to the leading trio. Similarly, Southern European nations, despite having strong technical universities and growing startup ecosystems, have struggled to attract comparable levels of AI funding.
What makes the disparity particularly striking is the role of international investors. Non-European investors account for over 80% of $250m+ rounds in AI, up from less than 25% at early stage. This is mostly driven by US investors, who have participated in over 490 rounds in European AI startups in 2023-2024. The pattern suggests that while Europe excels at nurturing early-stage AI companies, it still relies heavily on international capital to scale them.
The reasons for this geographic concentration appear to be structural - combining strong technical universities, government support for innovation, and established venture capital networks. These factors create self-reinforcing ecosystems that become increasingly attractive to both talent and capital.
Looking ahead, the challenge for European policymakers and investors will be to maintain the momentum in leading hubs while fostering growth in emerging ones. The alternative - allowing the AI talent and capital gap to widen - could leave much of Europe watching from the sidelines as the agentic AI revolution unfolds.
Technical Approaches: The European Way
European companies are taking distinctly different approaches to building AI agents compared to their American counterparts. While US companies like OpenAI focus on large, general-purpose models, European startups are often pursuing more specialised and efficient solutions.
Take Mistral AI's approach - rather than trying to match the scale of GPT-4, they're developing smaller, more focused models that can still achieve impressive results. This aligns with a broader European emphasis on efficiency and specialization that we see across the AI landscape. H Company in Paris, for example, has developed Runner H, a cloud-based web agent that reportedly outperforms OpenAI's solutions while being more cost-effective.
On the applications side, companies like Synthesia in the UK and ElevenLabs are building highly specialised agents for specific use cases - video content generation and voice synthesis respectively. This focus on solving particular problems well, rather than building general-purpose tools, reflects a pragmatic approach to AI development that has become something of a European hallmark.
This specialisation strategy comes with its own set of challenges and advantages. As noted in Sifted, "Building a one-size-fits-all agent to seamlessly plug into the hundreds of software and data sources enterprises rely on and orchestrate layers of actions is a big engineering challenge." European companies are instead tackling more manageable, focused problems - often with impressive results.
The approach is particularly evident in how European companies are approaching specific industries. Helsing's work on AI agents for defense applications, for instance, focuses on a narrow but crucial use case: autonomous aircraft control. Similarly, Parloa's development of voice and chat automation platforms specifically targets customer service operations, rather than trying to build a universal communication system.
However, this specialization also creates challenges around scaling. Many of these targeted solutions require significant adaptation to work in different contexts or industries. As Adam Shuaib from Episode 1 points out, "Many startups pitching themselves as AI agents aren't actually building truly autonomous agents capable of controlling whole workflows without human intervention." Instead, they're creating highly efficient tools for specific tasks - which might ultimately prove to be a more viable path to market.
The technical diversity in European AI development isn't just about business strategy - it's also influenced by regulatory considerations. With the EU AI Act on the horizon, companies are having to think carefully about how their agents operate and what degree of autonomy is appropriate. This regulatory framework might actually end up being an advantage, forcing European companies to develop more robust and trustworthy AI systems from the start.
The Path Ahead: Building Sustainable Advantage
The emergence of agentic AI represents more than just another tech wave - it marks a fundamental shift in how companies will need to operate and compete. Drawing on insights from both the UK regulatory framework and current market dynamics, several key patterns emerge that will shape the future of this technology.
First, the companies that will succeed with AI agents won't be those that simply adopt the technology for cost reduction. The IoD's research shows that while cost-cutting is widespread, the organisations seeing the highest impact from AI are those focusing on revenue generation and enhanced customer engagement. This aligns with what we're seeing in the European market, where companies like Mistral AI and H Company are building specialised solutions that create new value rather than just automating existing processes.
Second, the regulatory environment will play a crucial role in determining winners and losers. As the IoD report highlights, sectors with strong regulatory frameworks may actually be better positioned to benefit from AI agents, as regulation can provide stability and protect incumbents from being easily displaced. This suggests that rather than stifling innovation, thoughtful regulation could actually enable more sustainable adoption of AI agent technology.
Finally, organizations will need to fundamentally rethink how they develop and leverage talent. The traditional indicators of capability - from polished CVs to presentation skills - are being disrupted by AI agents. The challenge ahead will be identifying and nurturing the skills that complement AI rather than compete with it.
Looking across Europe's AI agent landscape, a clear pattern emerges. The companies most likely to succeed won't be those with the largest models or the most extensive datasets, but those that can effectively combine technical capability with deep domain expertise. The European approach - focused on specialized solutions and vertical integration - may prove more sustainable than the rush to build ever-larger general-purpose models.
For European startups and investors, this suggests a path forward that plays to the region's strengths: strong technical universities, deep industry expertise, and robust regulatory frameworks. While the concentration of AI talent and capital in the UK-France-Germany triangle poses challenges for broader European innovation, it also creates the potential for specialized hubs that can compete globally in specific domains.
The key will be ensuring that these centers of excellence can effectively collaborate and share knowledge, preventing the isolation that could limit their growth potential.
Comments